Re: GIMP release: 2.8.10 request, OS X

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jehan,

I don't patch Gimp anymore. In the past I did due to issues with language
UI, file size issues on Windows, etc. I feel that the source is quite
mature and does not need patching.

I started building the Windows version back during Gimp 2.7.1 when there
were no betas available and also no 64-bit python. I also wanted a pure
64-bit build. So, I took it upon myself to learn how to build all the
dependencies and build Gimp. Similarly, I started building the OSX version
when there was no pure OSX version and I wanted to learn how to build an
app for Mac, and hence McGimp.

For your question 3a ( you have 3 twice ;) ) - I have always mentioned the
plugins I consider useful for photography on my website. I am reproducing
the list here for completeness - you can always get the latest list from my
builds:
1.  G'MIC
2.  Simple Bilateral Blur (edge preserving smoothing)
3.  Save and Export
4.  Resynthesizer
5.  Refocus-it
6.  David's Batch Processor
7.  Exif-Browser
8.  Wavelet-Denoise
9.  Wavelet-Sharpen
10. Wavelet-Decompose
11. Texture Tiler
12. Fix Chromatic Aberration
13. Satequalizer (saturation equalizer)
14. Advance Unsharp Mask
15. Liquid Scaling (liquid rescale)
16. Separate+ (color management in Gimp)
17. Advanced Tone Mapping (faux HDR)
18. Recover Shadows and Highlights
19. ShellOut
20. BIMP

For question 3b, nothing prevents me from working with you. I think I do
bring whatever issues I find to everyone's attention here.

Finally as far as IRC is concerned, I have absolutely nothing against it
and would have loved to participate. However, I just don't have the time.

All the above I am doing as a hobby and I told you why I started it. I have
not stopped since I have heard from a lot of people that they like my
builds with all the plugins in one place and the 64-bit builds.

Hope this helps.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Partha



On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Jehan Pagès <jehan.marmottard@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi again!
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Jehan Pagès <jehan.marmottard@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Partha Bagchi <partha1b@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Sven,
> >>
> >> Have been away for the Thanksgiving holidays.:)
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 4:59 AM, scl <scl.gplus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> today there was [bugreport] about outdated builds for OSX.
> >>>
> >>> One reason for not being able to provide an official GIMP 2.8.8.
> >>> on OS X build were serious issues on OS X Mavericks, for instance
> >>> the [showstopper in the Text tool]. These have been solved in
> >>> the meantime (thanks especially to Simone Karin Lehmann, Michael
> >>> Natterer and Daniel Sabo).
> >>>
> >>> Therefore I think we should bring out GIMP 2.8.10 soon,
> >>> including an official OS X build (preferably also for some older
> >>> OS X versions). As far as I know Claytons build is at the ready.
> >>> All we need is a 2.8.10 bump, don't we?
> >>>
> >>> This situation shows us another weakness again:
> >>> there are at least four people working on an OS X release:
> >>> Clayton Walker, Simone Karin Lehmann, Partha Bagchi and
> >>> David Evans (Macports), not to mention the (still active?) maintainer
> >>> of the outdated Fink build and the various people building GIMP
> >>> on their own Macs. All of them do it in their rare spare time.
> >>> All of them struggle alone with the special build issues of GIMP
> >>> on OS X, its dependencies and the API incompatibilities between the
> >>> various OS X versions.
> >>> Can you guys and girls please find a way to work together?
> >>> What makes it so hard to speak to another at the mailing list or IRC
> >>> and unite your forces? Come on, we don't bite ;-)
> >>>
> >> Thanks for mentioning me. :)
> >>
> >> I am happy to collaborate with anyone on my builds. Note that I build
> Gimp
> >> and all dependencies from scratch using OSX gcc version 4.2.1; that is,
> I
> >> build gtk+, glib, pango, cairo etc. etc. etc. and then I build Gimp. I
> also
> >> include plugins that I believe are useful to photographers, well at
> least
> >> useful to me.
> >
> > This would be very nice.
> > I have a few questions:
> > 1/ Do you patch GIMP? Is it the reason why you make your own GIMP
> > build? If so, would you please contribute us all your patches? We
> > would be happy to check them and see what can be merged in our own
> > source. We are already working on merging some of Simone Karin
> > Lehmann's patches to improve our OSX code.
> > 2/ Do you patch some of the third parties? GTK+, glib, etc. If so,
> > have you tried to contributing upstream to these various projects?
> > 3/ What is exactly the list of plugins you include in your build?
> > 3/ Is there anything else which would prevent you to work with us on
> > delivering a robust upstream OSX build (faster than currently after a
> > source release!) instead of duplicating the work? Note that we have
> > obviously nothing about third party builds. If you really wish to, you
> > can still make your own builds (maybe slightly different), even though
> > you would help us making the upstream one. But even so, this could
> > profit to all of us, for instance by sharing build systems, thus
> > improving the procedure.
> > Ideally we could automatize all builds for very easy and early release!
> >
> > The way I see it, if we find a way to automatize builds, then we could
> > generate them on a server with no further human input, and available
> > for testers, which would make releases very easy to test (and
> > regenerate in case of issue) before any release.
>
> By the way! Since you also maintain a Windows build, all above
> questions would also pertain to your Windows build!
>
> Jehan
>
> >> Finally, it's not really feasible for me to come to IRC and hence I
> loose
> >> out on some of those discussion.
> >
> > Why is that? As I said to Simone too, I am not fond of IRC myself and
> > probably don't connect as much as the other contributors, but I make
> > some time to hang around there. If this is the price of collaboration,
> > it is not too high. Or is that a technical impossibility? (behind some
> > port-blocking firewall in a company or something?)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jehan
> >
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>> Sven
> >>>
> >> Thanks again,
> >> Partha
> >>
> >>>
> >>> [bugreport]:
> >>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=715094
> >>>
> >>> [showstopper in the Text tool]:
> >>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711281
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> >>> List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-
> >>> developer-list
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> >> List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
> >> List membership:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
>
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list





[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux