> On 2/2/11, Bogdan Szczurek wrote: > > > different after all. Please don't be mad at me for saying that for I > > don't intend to offend anybody. > > Nobody's mad at you :) And I said that to be sure that nobody will be :). > I see where you are coming from, I even spent > some time in the past providing this kind of solutions for e.g. > Inkscape users (http://bit.ly/i2HJeR), but you see, the whole topic is > really about near-term outlook vs. long-term outlook. I guess it is after allâ > Providing an easy way to switch to Ps shortcuts scheme is a near-term > solution, i.e. useful for people who just need GIMP once or twice in > their life after having used Ps for a decade or so. For people who > want to switch from Ps to GIMP this near-term solution will do a > terrible job: they will never get full mapping of keys (believe me, I > know what I'm saying), they won't be motivated enough to move to > native shortcuts, and they will find it difficult to follow all kinds > of documentation. Frankly I didn't expect such oposition agains idea of switchable shortcut âprofilesâ. Since shortcuts are modifiable anyway then why shoudn't they be changable en masse with profiles? â were my thoughts. I guess my mistake was to bring Ps case in ;). > (I'm not even saying how introducing this switch will motivate > everyone to ask the team to provide Ps-like menus using the very same > reasoning.) Possiblyâ but dropping Ps out of the thing, I still like the idea of âaccelerator themesâ. Yet I totaly respect people's opinion on that matter. Best regards! thebodzio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
