On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Alexia Death <alexiadeath@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 19:42:28 sigetch wrote: > I tried merging the smooth on top of the master yesterday. It works nicely, I'm very happy to hear that. > has a little bit of room for improvement(like makining the line catch up when > you stop or finish the stroke) I agree that improve of the stroke finishing process is very important. > the circular queue thingy and the fact that it's a miniobject stuck into paint > options object and its existence in general. > The way it would need to be > rewritten is adding a stroke array and its management functions into the paint > core and then smoth from that. The smooth function also belongs in the paint > core. I simply imitate the gimp_paint_options_get_gradient_color(...), but paint core is better choice to implement that function. > And why does ink have its own circular buffer? whats wrong with using the > paintcores one? > Well, simply by the historical reason. I implemented the smoothing of the ink tool first, and then extend it to the brush core, while keeping the first one unchanged... > And to discuss all of this, Id like to see you in IRC :) > I'd like to do so, but unfortunately, I have very little spare time in this month, neither in the next month... X( -- sigetch. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
