On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 23:15 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: > I'm not suggesting changing it's name, I'm proposing suffixing the > name of the algorithm with its purpose because the algorithm name > itself is outright misleading. Putting it in the menu in a menu item > named Sharpen would serve the same purpose, but I dont think we have > any other sharpening algorithms in default distribution to justify > that. Well, you are suggesting to change its name. Suffixing it is a name change and it has the potential to confuse users that are actually looking for "Unsharp Mask" and expect to find a standard filter under its usual name. About the menu, that's a good point. IMO it would be useful to have a "Sharpen" group in the "Filters->Enhance" menu, separated from the other filters. Here all sharpen filters can register and having "Unsharp Mask" in a group with "Sharpen" should be a good hint on what it actually does. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
