On Friday, April 9, 2010, 12:25:06, David Gowers wrote: > If not, you don't need to include the source itself; you just need to > provide a up-to-date link to somewhere the source can be obtained. Err, no. > The > GPL is specific on this point. Exactly. The GPL (v2 anyway, not sure about v3) requires that you provide either the sources, or a written assurance that you will provide the sources to anybody who obtained the binary, which must be valid for 3 years. IIRC, this was further clarified in the FSF's FAQ that just linking to some site that happens to have the source right now is not adequate, unless you've made arrangements with that site. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you. -- Von Helsing's Theorem _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
