Hi, On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:10 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote: > > What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need > > and sort/group the ones I use a lot. > > Maybe it would be better that most - if not all - of the brushes where > > copied to the users profile as a default instead of being static. > > I agree with that we should copy the standard brushes to the user > profile when the profile is created, just as we do with the default > tags. Users/distros/installers wanting to use the read-only brushes for > some reason could manually add "/usr/share/gimp/2.0/brushes" the brush path. > > Unless someone disagrees here I might actually hack on this soon. We discussed this before and came to the conclusion that it's a bad idea. What should be done instead of polluting the user directory with such copies is to create a copy transparently whenever the user edits a system resource. And there should be the possibility to easily hide system resources. The new tags system should help with this. Being able to hide resources by adding a 'hidden' tag was one of the reasons for adding tags in the first place. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
