Re: What would be a better set of default resources?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
shirakawa.akira@xxxxxxxxx (2009-07-22 at 1218.30 +0200):
> Martin Nordholts wrote:
> 
> > I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a 
> > say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I 
> > don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think 
> 
> Regarding this, as an user (and not a programmer), I've always wondered 
> why in the case of vector brushes a "scaling" setting is used instead of 
> fiddling directly (and easily) with their size.

I avoid scale whenever I can, so for vector brushes I just use the
brush editor. And I would wish any other brush would be "editable". In
other words, support "pixmap" as "shape" for the editor, or some other
solution instead of the current mix of methods.

GSR
 
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux