Re: What would be a better set of default resources?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/7/22 David Gowers wrote:

> tools. When I think about it, I wonder whether such users ever get to using
> GIMP with any level of frequency or intensity, as IMO with the global-brush
> option off

Don't wonder -- they do. And I do too :)

(Speaking of which, the fact that tools presets don't save/restore
scale value isn't helpful either.)

>>Clear separation of default settings for different tools is such an obvious
>>thing...
> I agree with that. Unfortunately, having sensible, different defaults for
> different tools is in direct conflict with having an efficient,
> un-surprising workflow

Contrary to that I would yell every time I switched from Paintbrush to
Eraser if I didn't have global brush disabled. It's way too convenient
to use e.g. smaller eraser *automatically* than changing scale back
and forth. As you say, workflow is what matters :) But it looks like
this discussion is going nowhere, so EOT for me :)

Alexandre
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux