Actually I got the impression that it had changed, and now box-filtering was used, which does account for all input pixels. OTOH, Lanczos currently produces poor results. Geert Jordaans (sp?) was working on improving this. On 10/30/07, Guillermo Espertino <gespertino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd add the quality of downscaling as a high priority need. Currently > it's possible to downscale images using 50% steps at a time (it was > discussed before) but it would be better if one single scaling step > produces the best quality possible (maybe automating the 50% steps, as > it was discussed before). > IIRC Sven informed that this issue would be easier to address with GEGL, > so I don't know if proposing this fix before GEGL is appropriate. Anyway > I'd like to point that it's a need for people who work with graphics for > the web. > > Gez. > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer > _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
