On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:53:59 +0200, Robert L Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What about the case where the original quality was 96 or 98, and it's > resaved at the same quality level? My quick test showed a slight > decrease in file size, but probably very little in the way of image > degradation. Thanks, I suspect that could be the result of some of the less important parameters getting a similar default, the encoding method (int/fp) or simply the algorithm efficiencies. eg An earlier post indicated Jpeg:sampling-factor also changed from 2x1,1x1,1x1 to 2x2,1x1,1x1. /gg _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
