On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:35:30 +0200, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 08:17 -0400, Robert L Krawitz wrote: > >> Note that GIMP is not the only application that does this; > > Why should any application do what you suggest? If you open a JPEG file > and save it again as JPEG, then the original quality factor is > completely irrelevant. You are doing a lossy operation, there is no way > to save the file with the same quality again. > > > Sven It would seem reasonable to assume that if the user has selected a size/quality trade-off given by a specific value, say, quality=98 he does not want to have to explicitly remake that decision every time he touches it. Also this info I part of the header and part of specification of that file so arbitarily changing it would seem to me to be a spec violation. Does your reply indicate you take a "this feature not a bug" approach here and you think is the best way gimp should deal with this situation? Thx. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
