Hi, On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:32 +0100, Simon Budig wrote: > Please realize that your mails sound very much like you dont really want > to change anything. True. I don't think that the requested change should be made. That does however not mean that it cannot be done and will not be done. There has never been any final decision from my part. Everything I say is subject to discussion and I am always open for arguments and willing to change my mind. In this particular case I do however expect that someone takes the time to evaluate both the 2.2 and the current UI and to check them against common use cases. And if it turns out that we need two delays, then it would have been appropriate to come up with a quick mockup of how such a user interface could look like without reintroducing the problems that we have with the old UI. I don't think that is asked too much. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
