I don't get where the expectation that postings from gimp.org addresses
should be considered as anything but the individual _expression_ of the
author. Expecting a volunteer organization to have a rigid public face
is ridiculous.
When I initially joined the list several years ago I was disappointed in the attitude of one/some "gimp.org" posters because I thought they were in some way associated with the project. There was too much noise and disrespect so I left the list because of it (but have since re-joined).
Personally I don't think it is an unreasonable expectation that someone with a gimp.org email is associated with the project. It may be ridiculous to expect a "rigid" public face, but I think the public should expect the project to have a respectable face.
Can we please stop cluttering the development mailing list with this
now?
The project has a problem. Several people have pointed out the problem. Although not explicitly stated, I would think the purpose of the developer list is to discuss project issues.
Tim Jedlicka, Network Entomologist
bonzo@xxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.galifree.com
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
