Von: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@xxxxxxxxxxx> > On Tuesday 29 August 2006 13:14, Carol Spears wrote: > > when i put together the people for the gtk+ planet, i limited it to > > only those who had contributed for the current version cycle. > > I disagree with this strategy. First of all, because it may imply that > people that did not contribute for the next version will be removed. > And secondly, because many people contributed in the past and are worth > mentioning. IMO it is worth mentioning that we did discuss a similiar distinction for the GIMP about dialog during LGM. Right now, it looks like GIMP has a huge amount of active developers. This may explain why some people think that we're turining down enhancement requests because we don't like them, while the reason is we just don't have the manpower. So carol's trategy doesn't sound like the worst possible metric to me. Likewise, the feeds provided at gimp.org should be about people involved with GIMP. Originally there was one feed for the active developers and and for active users. IMO it should also be limited to posts in the respective person's gimp- or graphics-related categories. For example, we do not need to relay conspiracy theories or nationalist thoughts. Regards, Michael -- "Feel free" – 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
