On Friday 04 February 2005 07:44, Shlomi Fish wrote: > On Thursday 03 February 2005 21:12, Sven Neumann wrote: > > Mitch, me and probably others already have some changes pending that > > would introduce a dependency on gtk+-2.6. So far we have usually > > waited until a package reaches debian testing before depending on it. > > Since gtk+-2.6 only just yesterday appeared in debian unstable, this > > would mean waiting at least another nine days. Now I wonder if that's > > worth it. I'd rather ask you to speak up if you want to hack on GIMP > > CVS and a dependency on gtk+-2.6 would cause you serious problems. If > > noone objects, we will bump the minimum required gtk+ version this > > weekend. > > I haven't tried to compile gtk-2.6 for Mandrake yet. At the worst case, I > can install it from source using ./configure --prefix=. > Well, now I tried to compile and install gtk-2.6 on Mandrake 10.1. I used the Cooker Source RPMs, and compiled them each in turn. gtk+-2.6.0 required the new version of pango, which in turn required the new version of automake 1.8 to be compiled. The compilation of the automake 1.8 RPM took a long time due to the fact that all the tests was run. There's a macro in the beginning of the RPM SPEC that instructs the tests not to run, so I suggest people either set it to false or install the automake-1.8 compiled RPM. That was my main problem. After that everything mostly went well. When I installed the gtk RPMs, I got a file conflict with one of the files of gtk-engines2, so I had to use "rpm --replacefiles". Compiling the new gtk-engines2 RPM worked, but trying to install it ended up in other packages that required it as a dependency, so I did not go into there. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish shlomif@xxxxxxxxxxx Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ Knuth is not God! It took him two days to build the Roman Empire.