On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:58:27AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:17:43PM -0800, Carol Spears <carol@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libgtk2.0-0 > > > > > i guess that apt is not so well named lately? maybe "apt not to" is > > better? > > $ apt-get install libgtk2.0-0/unstable > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Selected version 2.6.1-2 (Debian-amd64:3.2/unstable) for libgtk2.0-0 > libgtk2.0-0 is already the newest version. > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 77 not upgraded. > > 2.6 is definitely in unstable, and apt works fine to retrieve it. > this confirms my suspicions that apt has a personal vendetta against just me. carol
