On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:03:28PM +0000, Alan Horkan wrote: > On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Simon Budig wrote: > > Alan Horkan (horkana@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: > > > > Alan Horkan <horkana@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > My counterpoint is that even though a submenu means only one extra > menu in the parent menu it means another level and more items to > search through. It doesn't make the specific feature any more > difficutl to use but more menu items overall can complicate the task of > finding anything. > this is where gimp is at its best though. searching endlessly through the menus for one thing found many many more things i had needed before or had heard of or would be hearing of soon. if it makes sense to you out of the box, you are using software that is beneath your ability. you will soon be in a bleak and terrible life in which everything you know has been done and is very predictible. what is it exactly that you do not like about hunting for things in software? > I'll try and show more restraint and not drag out discussions longer in > future, I admit I got a little carried away. In other mailing lists > normally only those interested in the thread would keep reading and > responding to it. > hmm, yes. this is really suspicious, isnt it? carol
