On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 08:35:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Carol Spears <carol@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > I cannot reproduce your brush-stroking result for gimp-2.0 then. Is > > > that a recent version of gimp-2.0 that you've been using? Does it > > > contain the fix for bug #147836? > > > > > i am using gimp-2.0 from debian. > > > > is there a reason that it would be fixed in the 2.0 branch and not in > > the 2.1 branch? > > Huh? Perhaps you should have another look at the image you posted > (http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke.png). It shows different results > for gimp-2.0 and gimp-2.1. I can however not reproduce this. The > results I get for stroking look basically identical in gimp-2.1, > gimp-2.0 and gimp-1.2. I admit that the result isn't very satisfying > but I cannot reproduce your results. My guess is that you used a > different brush when creating the stroke with gimp-2.0. > > The bug report I refered to should actually not affect your particular > example but I asked nevertheless just to be sure what versions we are > comparing here. As you could have easily found out by looking at > bugzilla, the fix for #147836 is in gimp-2.0.4 and of course it is > also in the HEAD branch. > well, due to the many concerns about how i made these images, there is now a whole series of pngs/xcfs in this same directory, ending with: http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke4.png where the same selection is used in all three gimp versions. the selection has been saved in: http://carol.gimp.org/files/stroke4.xcf and simon has made certain that i did not use (even accidentally) different brushes. simon and mitch are right now discussing changes to the paintcore which might have affected this. anyone can read this discussion here: http://carol.gimp.org/gallery/journal/gimp-2004-09-25.txt do you have changes in your version that no one else has? carol
