Re: [Gimp-developer] Should the checkerboard be linked to the window or to the image?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:36:43PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Carol Spears <carol@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > the same way you can change the padding color now.  i would not have
> > been able to imagine such an interface to the previews without all those
> > new options for customizing your sessions.  all this stuff is sane?
> 
> You might not have noticed that we have started to remove options from
> the user interface. However you should be aware of the fact that we
> try not to add new options unless there's a very good reason for it.
> 
> Actually the plan was to let the plug-in previews respect the settings
> from gimprc that already exist:
> 
>   (transparency-size medium-checks)
> 
>      Sets the size of the checkerboard used to display  transparency.
>      Possible  values  are  small-checks,  medium-checks  and  large-
>      checks.
> 
>   (transparency-type gray-checks)
> 
>      Sets the manner in which transparency is  displayed  in  images.
>      Possible  values  are  light-checks,  gray-checks,  dark-checks,
>      white-only, gray-only and black-only.
>

  How hard would this be to implement?

> That would of course mean that the same settings apply to plug-in
> previews and to image windows.
>
  Which is the way it should be if we want to be consistant.

-- 
david@xxxxxxxxxxx
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux