On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:32:21AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: > Roman Joost <romanjoost@xxxxxx> writes: > > > I looked at http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/UseCatalog.html#d0e3162 > > and it seems for me, that we don't need a DTD declaration on top of > > gimp.xml if the catalog file is present and the corresponding > > environment variable is set. I tried to build the manual after removing > > the declaration and the translation process works fine. If this would > > work on other machines, i'll remove the DTD declaration on top of > > gimp.xml. > > You loose the ability to validate the file w/o explicitely specifying > the DTD file. Also I am surprised that you can process the file w/o > the DTD. Aren't you using any entities? What would be the advantage of > removing the DTD declaration? We don't use entities anymore (except for one in gimp.xml). I thought, that the advantage of removing the DTD declaration would be no more hassles with building the manual. The XML book from www.sagehill.net explains, that a (correct) catalog file would be the best of both - local and network DTD. Greetings, -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanjoost@xxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
