On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:14, David Neary wrote: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > Yes, please. But we probably need to get to a point here. > > GIMP-something.0 sounds pretty weird for a stable release... > > I say it's time for a show of hands. My vote is for 2.0, because > there are likely to be lots of new bugs and 1.4 makes it sould > like a really stable release. I couldn't have said it any better. A new road map (or release plan) will have to be written no matter if we call the next release 1.4 or 2.0 - and changing a three year old release plan is something that most people involved with software will understand. I say we go for 2.0 - and, as mentioned elsewhere on this list, plan for a quick 2.2 bug-fix release later this year. Sincerely, ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@xxxxxxxx>
