Re: [Gimp-developer] state of libgimptool and assorted hacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:38:59PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I'm surprised by the silence. Should I interpret it as an approbation?

Sounds pretty bad. The GIMP is developing a history of adding "cool"
features which then become unmaintained and are ultimately just turned
off in CVS. Maybe future "cool" stuff should be rejected until it's
maintainable, thereby keeping up the pressure to actually make it work
rather than just "it's checked in, I'll sort it out properly in a few
weeks/ months/ years" ?

Nick.

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux