On Sunday 17 February 2002 00:18, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote: > lourens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2002-02-16 at 0929.47 +0100): > > Thirdly, we now have three different Transform options. I know that > > Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot, but with > > this you can't see the trees for the forest. Why not just a single > > transform tool, and an option there to do the whole image or just > > the current layer? Or better even, allow the selection of multiple > > layers in the layers dialog box, so that you can have finer-grained > > control over what you are changing and what not. > > Transform menu entries do some basics and in some cases pretty > hardcoded (rotate 90*n degrees), and transform tool is more like the > tool definition you use, it uses the mouse, and is more free. Yes I know. But we could just add a few buttons for 90, 180 and 270 degrees to the transform tool, and possibly a radio button with Single Layer or All Layers. Or just perform on the Selected Layers if we get the select-multiple-layers feature. One difference is ofcourse that the Image>->Transforms->Rotate->90 Degrees changes the canvas size as well, while the transform tool doesn't. An extra checkbox? Lourens -- GPG public key: http://home.student.utwente.nl/l.e.veen/lourens.key
