Hi, Nick Lamb <njl98r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:57:37PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > > if we really don't care about the interactive use, we could simply use > > one or more additional parameters in the PDB call to avoid all the hassle. > > They could be added at the end and would thus be optional. If we > > reimplement the PDB using GParam and GParamSpecs as found in GLib-2.0, > > we will get named parameters anyway. > > This may be the smartest plan after all. Is such a GParam PDB already on > the cards in Gimp 1.4 ? the PDB is still untouched (despite a change in the wire protocol how to handle floating point values). Rewriting the PDB using GParam should however be not too much work. Fixing all plug-ins and scripts afterwards will be, but could probably be done (semi)automatically. Salut, Sven
