On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:57:37PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > if we really don't care about the interactive use, we could simply use > one or more additional parameters in the PDB call to avoid all the hassle. > They could be added at the end and would thus be optional. If we > reimplement the PDB using GParam and GParamSpecs as found in GLib-2.0, > we will get named parameters anyway. This may be the smartest plan after all. Is such a GParam PDB already on the cards in Gimp 1.4 ? Nick.
