These 1.4K bytes were from Christoph Rauch, > Agreed. Then... why not use WML. It's easy to learn and flexible enough > for almost everything. Uses a makefile system and various includeable > languages (you need not use them if you dont want to). But then... it may > be overkill. ;-)) No! The current GNOME-website is made with wml. And the problem is that wml is a horrible piece of crap. The next generation GNOME-website will not use wml because its a nightmare to maintain, not to mention incredibly difficult or perhaps impossible to compile without some serious black magic. If we used wml we would be where we are right now. -- Ville Pätsi -- drc@xxxxxxxxx
