Andreas Jaekel schrieb: > Concerning the "Content Engine": > We use CVS and a simple perl script for recursive dirctory walks > to compile the pages from templates. We have design and content > templates, but that's only the way we do it. I had something like this in mind too. > The advantages are: > o [...deleted...] Plausible. > Now, I'm not saying this is the tool to use. Rather, I'm suggesting > to use something like it. I'd gladly provide it as a starting point, > but a few small tune-ups are in order. I'd volunteer to write these. Where can we find it? Is there a public CVS server to get it? I would like to document the current system to ease transition to a new or only improved one. > I think using nothing but html pages will simply not work and using > a complicated content management will be too hard to learn. A newby > joining in later will have a high learning curve ahead of him/her > before (s)he can contribute. Agreed. Then... why not use WML. It's easy to learn and flexible enough for almost everything. Uses a makefile system and various includeable languages (you need not use them if you dont want to). But then... it may be overkill. ;-)) Christoph -- http://home.bn-paf.de/smokey/
