Michael wrote: > Theoretically this > would resemble the layer without mask That's if you assume that the masking is additive -- actually it's multiplicative. --Adam -- Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@xxxxxxxx http://www.foxbox.org/
Michael wrote: > Theoretically this > would resemble the layer without mask That's if you assume that the masking is additive -- actually it's multiplicative. --Adam -- Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ adam@xxxxxxxx http://www.foxbox.org/
|