Re: [PATCH] improving on i18n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2000-12-06 at 14:19:02, Sven Neumann wrote:

> I have discussed your patch with Mitch and it really looks safe. The 
> problem we see is that most likely translators will find a lot of 
> collisions and each string marked with your Q_ macro will end up being
> untranslated in all languages until translators change the po-files
> (...)

Thanks tor this! It should be no problem for translators - I have another
patch, that doesn't _require_ modified translations. If you replace
_("File") with Q_("!menu!File") in your code, old translations (containing
only "File") will still work. I'll send improved patch tomorrow.

> I'd still prefer a clean solution that would give every translator the
> chance to apply different translations for every string without the need
> to change the original string. This would make it possible to work around
> (...)

So do I :-)
Believe me, I _hate_ gettext, but it's the only thing we have _now_.


Zbigniew


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux