Re: [PATCH] improving on i18n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:40:28PM +0000, Nick Lamb <njl98r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And givne that a large amount of similar fixes went into the gimp not too
> > long ago this patch really should be considered.
> 
> Those fixes made Gimp have more bugs. No more patches like that thanks.

Well, those patches actually made i18n work again. so if they added new bugs
the patches were problematic. so this means a patch must be looked at on a
per-patch-basis.

Anyway, if Sven *still* does not want that that's reason enough for me to
also now want it ;)

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux