On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:17:23PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Probably not ;) Probably it makes sense because, at one point, all > drawables might have useful offsets. Do layer masks have offsets? Obviously you wouldn't be able to set the offset on the mask, but perhaps it has one anyway (the layer's) ? In any case, it makes some sense for this to be a method on a drawable, but the C API could alias it if C developers aren't smart enough to look in the right place :) Nick.
