Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:43:30 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann <pcg@xxxxxxxx> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:56:35AM -0400, Robert L Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hope to release in a few months), we'll probably want to ship printer > definitions, color profiles, possibly dither matrices, and such as > separate files rather than compiled in to the binary. I think it's not a good idea to put knowledge about printer files (or any plug-in-specific data) into gimptool. What's wrong about just using $gimpdatadir/gimp-print? I don't think that gimptool should know anything about specific plugins. At the very least I want agreement on conventions about what goes where. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@xxxxxxxxxxxx Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton
