On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Carey Bunks wrote: > I think that Michael has a good point here. Why is it useful to > declare a feature freeze? In my opinion the answer is so people can > begin making plans with respect to the upcoming new stable release. > If just anything is allowed after a feature freeze why declare one? On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Olof S Kylander wrote: > It depends how you specify feature freeze. Some specify it as a stop to > add anything (nearly a code freeze) some one else specify it as a clean up > and fix time until we enter code freeze. > > Me my self specify it as a clean up and fix time (that includes > e.g cleaning the UI to be consistent). If no-one else will do it, I hearby offer to REVERT all features added to Gimp. It's quite obvious that some/ most of the people here will continue to rationalise additional features until well into the new millenium (and I don't mean 2000). Nick.
