On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:26:11PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:07:25AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> > Hi Roman -
> > when you talk about a "3.0" manual version in "3.0" - I am with the
> > impression that the purposed changes would take place before GIMP 3.0
> > itself (as the next version shall be 2.10)
> >
> > So - it looks like the purposed version numbering would dissociate the
> > manual version from GIMP's version - is that so? I think that might
> > be confusing - although on a second thought it could be
> > a manageable confusion, if it is clearly specified, inv arious places, that,
> > for example, gimp-help-2 "3.0" refers to "gimp-2.10" .
> >
> > (As for the idea of going github I am of the same opinion as Jehan.
> > We could put a mirror ("fork" in github parlor) there - but the
> > authoritative repository
> > should, by the reasons listed and maybe some more,
> > be kept in the gnome infrastructure).
>
> I too agree. IMHO gimp-help should follow the gimp versioning convention
> for avoid confusion, i.e. the new gimp-help-2 should be gimp-2.10.
Cheers for spotting this. Yes it shoudl be 2.10.
Kind Regards
--
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-docs-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
