On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:07 +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost <romanofski@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: > > > > http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main > > > > Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not to be read as: go > > ahead and implement, but rather look into it for it's feasibility. > > > > If there are no objections or comments I'd basically call the roadmap > > silently as accepted. For each point I think it'll be good to create > > bugs so we can track progress. > > I've not read it in details and mostly skimmed through. > > I got intrigued by a specific point though: moving the manual to > github. Really? I know several (all?) of GNOME's repos have already > been *mirrored* to github. Personally I find it acceptable if repos > are just mirrored (that's after all one of the point of git as a > "distributed" revision control), but not if it is to be considered the > new main repository of the project. github is just another of these > platforms led by a company, just like was Sourceforge (and now look, > with time, all projects are fleeing it, just as we did), and like will > be some other "fashionable" platform in the future. So I say, we keep > control of the main repo. And if a github mirror had to be created, > that would only be to profit of its network effect (why not), but it > must be soon clear to new contributors that they must sync with the > GNOME repo in the end, not the github one. > > Was that what you were proposing? If so, ok. > > If you really propose to "move" the main repo to github (as it is > worded on the wiki), then I personally vote against. +1 from me. Why would you move to github? I agree with everything Jehan said. Regards, --Mitch _______________________________________________ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
