julien (Dienstag, 6. Januar 2009, 16:02): > Yes, DocBook-4.5 is recognized by my system. But why doesn't it > accept "revnumber?" ? It *does*, you were fooled by error messages which had nothing to do with the <revnumber> tags. Try it again with a file that is valid according to DocBook-4.3 DTD. > We must get rid of this <revnumber> tag, because "svn status" goes on > listing as "M" the files I have committed, only because the revnumber > has changed. Are you sure? IMHO this can't happen: the *real* text is "$Revision$" (in the xml file), and what we see is just subversion's expanded text. > But it would be interesting to keep a <revision> without <revnumber> > because of the date, author and revremark tags. I can live without that information... ;-) Bye, Ulf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
