> julien (Dienstag, 6. Januar 2009, 16:02): >> Yes, DocBook-4.5 is recognized by my system. But why doesn't it >> accept "revnumber?" ? > > It *does*, you were fooled by error messages which had nothing to do > with the <revnumber> tags. Try it again with a file that is valid > according to DocBook-4.3 DTD. > I tried with several files that were valid for dockbook-4.3 and I always get the same error... >> We must get rid of this <revnumber> tag, because "svn status" goes on >> listing as "M" the files I have committed, only because the revnumber >> has changed. > > Are you sure? IMHO this can't happen: the *real* text is "$Revision$" > (in the xml file), and what we see is just subversion's expanded text. > 1- I create a pot file, after editing the xml file. 2- I create the po-fr file. 3- I commit Some days after, I "svn update". The revnumber in the xml file is changed. 4- I run make po-fr : the msgid "$Revision: xxxx $" is changed and the item is marked as "Fuzzy" 5- svn status lists the po file as "M"...and there you have it! If I run "make pot" for all xml files, it's worse: I have a huge commit with all the po-fr, that I have not time to edit. So I have to create pot one by one. >> But it would be interesting to keep a <revision> without <revnumber> >> because of the date, author and revremark tags. > > I can live without that information... ;-) Good! Too many problems with this minor question. I'll remove the <sect2info> tags Bye, Julien _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
