Hi, > I still think we should remove the <revhistory> entries, maybe adding a > <!-- $Id$ --> instead, which will be expanded by SVN to > <!-- $Id: foo.xml 2666 2009-02-30 21:30:00Z author $ --> What is interesting for users is "Has the information in this file changed or been updated?". We must distinguish: - "semantic" changes, bringing new information . update to v2.6 . correction of errors - "formal" changes, not bringing new information . typos corrections . rewriting the text for better understanding without adding any new information. . changes in xml structure It seems that your $id$ proposition doesn't distinguish this. I propose to add two new <para> at the top of files, showing "semantic" changes, that will appear in the html: <sect2> <para>subcript>File updated to v2.6 on ... by ...</subscript></para> <para>subcript>File improved on ... by ...</subscript></para> and perhaps also: <para>subcript>File translated to ... on ... by ...</subscript></para> <subscript> because this information must be unobstrusive in the HTML file. An interest is that these <para> can be translated in all languages, avoiding english in localised html. "Formal" changes remain in the commented "Section history" Julien _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
