>> Perhaps users reading the HTML files want to know when the text has >> been updated and who updated it? > > If the date is e.g. 2006-xx-yy or 2009-xx-yy, what do you (or what does > the user) *really* know? For instance, is this text up-to-date? The last GIMP release was a few monthes ago. If the date is 2006-xx-yy, then this file has not been updated. When I review files for v2.6, I always give a new date, even if there is no change in the file. > > The release date of the gimp-help package is probably more helpful. The last gimp-help-package is 2.4, out of date. Now GIMP has an online help, with the present status of the help ( well, when our po system is OK ;-) .) > >> But the <revnumber> is of no use. Can we delete it keeping the rest? > > According to DTDG, only <date> is required, everything else is > optional, so we can remove <revnumber>. Good, I'll do that. > > I still think we should remove the <revhistory> entries, maybe adding a > <!-- $Id$ --> instead, which will be expanded by SVN to > <!-- $Id: foo.xml 2666 2009-02-30 21:30:00Z author $ --> If you like. But an hour with seconds... :-( Julien _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
