I haven't read the threads, so apologies if i'm repeating something: why not let the pages in each language develop independently of each other and the english version (assuming the wiki model goes ahead)? With wikipedia at present, languages on different pages are being developed totally independently to each other and that seems to be working fine. --- On Mon, 6/16/08, Marco Ciampa <ciampix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Marco Ciampa <ciampix@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: GIMP manual writing in 2009 > To: gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Monday, June 16, 2008, 8:14 PM > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:32:25PM +0900, Choi, JiHui wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:39 PM, julien > <jm.hard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is it easy to find what has changed in the Wiki? > > > > > This is the most problem of wiki. > > if just few languages or pages, it's not a matter. > > but we have 12 languages and a thousond pages.. > > I can't imagine how to find changes of each pages > Yes it could be a nightmare without some automated tools! > > :-( > > This is THE reason of gettext. I do not know of anything > similar of gettext > with the fuzzy/untranslated automatic detection (if there > is something > outthere, please tell me more!). > If it could be implemented in a wiki engine, than wiki > could be the perfet > solution: easy and manageable. > Now is only easy (at the start) but not manageable. > > -- > > Marco Ciampa > > +--------------------+ > | Linux User #78271 | > | FSFE fellow #364 | > +--------------------+ > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-docs mailing list > Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
