On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 06:33:44AM -0700, Charlie Albright wrote: > > I haven't read the threads, so apologies if i'm repeating something: why > not let the pages in each language develop independently of each other and > the english version (assuming the wiki model goes ahead)? With wikipedia > at present, languages on different pages are being developed totally > independently to each other and that seems to be working fine. Mainly for two reasons (that are just the same reasons for which it is handy to have just one reference language): 1) the contestual help system: the f1 key should go to the same section of the local language. The manual structure must be near the same for all the lanuage for this mechanism to work. I cannot think about a new reference without affecting all the other languages. 2) the manual structure: creating and mantaining coherent the structure of a manual with glossary, index, tutorial and references is a tough work! Many of us are simply translators and would simply remain so, contributing only in those fields where they are better suited. I really appreciate the work done by the manual administrators, I could not do any better! ciao! -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
