Kolbjørn Stuestøl (Samstag, 1. März 2008, 18:55): > Axel Wernicke wrote: > > 2008/2/29, julien <jm.hard@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jm.hard@xxxxxxxxxx>>: > > The problem is not for writing new files nor translating. It is > > in updating. > > In some files, the xml structure has to be changed, but we must > > keep the > > old version for non-updated languages. This results in two > > parallel versions. > > It's not impossible to manage , but it's a real headhache. > > And what will happen with the next version? A shambles. > > > > > > I absolutely have to agree here. At some point we have to throw out > > dead languages. There simply is no way around this with the current > > technology. > > > > lexA > > Some thoughts from a novice: > If this is (will be) a great problem, is it possible to have two > separate versions? We could create a subversion branch and then use "trunk" for 2.6 and "branches/gimp-help-2-4" for 2.4, similar to "gimp/trunk" and "gimp/branches/gimp-2-4". We would then have to commit most of our changes twice, and I'm not sure if this would solve or create problems, though. Ulf
Attachment:
pgpiRhczFerLK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
