On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:11:35AM +0200, Axel Wernicke wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Jakub, > > Am 25.05.2006 um 10:44 schrieb Jakub Friedl: > > > >The link doesnt work foer me. > I mailed the correct one to the list already. > > >Shouldnt we separate the files by language to remove the problem? > This way I think we would lose the one GIMP manual. We instead would > have a dozen books that more and more will diverse or even die. > Be sure I know many of the multi-language annoyances in our files, > but anyway I think they are the only way to get ONE manual in > different languages. This stays true as long as we work on a day by > day basis on the (en) manual, not having a strong focus on en an > timing. To change that would mean we'd need a schedule with fixed(!) > deadlines. "Somebody" would write and finish (!) the en book and then > all the "ohters" would take that bible and translate it into their > respective language. - AFAIK is this not the style of work that fits > our needs and pleasures. 100% agree. > >Many edits i make are edits like improving the style, removing > >typos, fixing > >terminology - these tend to affect many files (and it is often not > >predictable which files until actually doing the work - i use grep > >extensivelly) > This is a fact I'm experiencing too. May be we should (as we do > already today) limit these changes to the absolutely necessary and > collect ideas for huge grep jobs (Gimp -> GIMP would be one of my > favorites btw. ) 100% agree: lets kill it! > and do them after an anouncement on the list. This > way everybody would have a chance to check in local changes in the > first hand. > > After all it's true: commit early, commit often :) Oh yeah!!! ;-) bye -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
