On 29 January 2016 at 19:07, Adam Bavier <adam.bavier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > numbers in that benchmark, I propose adding a asterisk * by each gegl number > would help the reader understand that something is different with this > library. Then add the corresponding asterisk down by the statement, "GEGL > is not really designed for batch-style processing -- it targets interactive > applications, like paint programs." Since gegl is the only interactive That's a good idea, thank you. I've updated the page with numbered notes by some results to make the qualifications easier to find. John _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list List address: gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list