Re: VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 29 January 2016 at 19:07, Adam Bavier <adam.bavier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> numbers in that benchmark, I propose adding a asterisk * by each gegl number
> would help the reader understand that something is different with this
> library.  Then add the corresponding asterisk down by the statement, "GEGL
> is not really designed for batch-style processing -- it targets interactive
> applications, like paint programs."  Since gegl is the only interactive

That's a good idea, thank you. I've updated the page with numbered
notes by some results to make the qualifications easier to find.

gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership:

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux