VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

the developers of VIPS/libvips, a batch image-processing library,
have a performance and memory usage comparison on their website,
including a GEGL test. [1]
Some days ago I told John Cupitt, the maintainer there, some issues
with the reported GEGL tests.
In his answer to me John points out that GEGL is a bit odd in this
comparison, because it is the only interactive image processing library
there. He therefore suggests to remove GEGL from this list.

What do you GEGL developers think - does anybody need these results so
GEGL should reside in this comparison or would it be OK, if John
removed it from the list?

Greetings

Sven

[1]
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php?title=Speed_and_Memory_Use


_______________________________________________
gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list




[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux