Hi,
as a foundation for the further GEGL porting work, the LGM and GSOC 2013
I updated the GEGL porting matrix in our developer wiki [1].
Please review.
I think - despite of all the respectable work done - it's no secrets to
say that the GEGL port has been a topic for long, is still a show
stopper for version 2.10 and all further work and yet there's still a
lot to do. Beside others currently 43% of the filters are ported.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not blaming anybody. Let's see how we can boost
the process.
I think the following could help:
- Get rid of filters that don't match to the product vision or are
outdated. Priorize the remaining filters. Alexandre wrote a mindstorm
article [2] in the wiki and I fully agree with it. The LGM is a good
opportunity to discuss it and also we have the mailing lists and IRC.
Ask the artists at LGM and in our mailing lists about their needs.
- Focus the 2013 GSOC projects on the GEGL port.
- Port only a set of core functions and let the other functions do their
work through PDB-API calls from a scripting language (Script-Fu or
Python), if that can be done easier than writing C code. So the other
functions could inherit silently all the GEGL capabilities.
- If other open source projects, like Darktable, Digikam, OpenCV,
RawTherapee etc., have solutions for our missing filters, why not call
their libraries through GEGL in a first step?
Kind regards,
Sven
[1] http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Hacking:Porting_filters_to_GEGL
[2]
http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Mindstorm:Revamping_default_plugins_and_scripts
_______________________________________________
gegl-developer-list mailing list
gegl-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
