On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:36 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote: > > GIMP tends to claim C89 compatibility; we shouldnt assume more modern > > language standard than GIMP does. > > Hi Ãyvind > > What problems do you expect us to get if we begin to rely on an 11 year > old standard instead of a 21 year old standard? > > At what time has enough time passed for us to feel comfortable using the > improvements in C99? As soon as enough compilers support it so that we don't loose platform compatibility. What specific C99 features are we talking about at all? Is there a specific feature that you guys would like to use? Sven _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
