On 06/29/2009 09:53 PM, Nicolas Robidoux wrote: > IMHO, when all you are dealing with are 3x3 matrices (which are not > arbitrary 3x3, since they represent affine + perspective > transformations), it is likely that a general purpose matrix library > would be slower. Even more so with 2x2. > > So, my vote is actually for "not library." > I'd expect any high quality matrix library to provide optimized routines and data structures for 3x3 matrices. / Martin _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
