On 06/29/2009 03:16 PM, Nicolas Robidoux wrote: > a type which could be named > GeglMatrix2. > > Is it really worth it to create (name) a new GEGL type just for this > purpose? A plain array sure seems more expedient. > Since GeglMatrix3 exists, GeglMatrix2 also should exist for consistency. Personally I don't see the point in duplicating a matrix lib in every software, i.e. I question the introduction of GeglMatrix3 in the first place, I mean there certainly must be high quality libs for matrix operations out there, but that's a different story... / Martin _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
