Martin Nordhotls wrote: > Personally I don't see the point in duplicating a matrix lib in > every software, i.e. I question the introduction of GeglMatrix3 in > the first place, I mean there certainly must be high quality libs > for matrix operations out there, but that's a different story... IMHO, when all you are dealing with are 3x3 matrices (which are not arbitrary 3x3, since they represent affine + perspective transformations), it is likely that a general purpose matrix library would be slower. Even more so with 2x2. So, my vote is actually for "not library." Nicolas Robidoux _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
